| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| 7970 custom backgrounds | 28 Feb 2007 23:57 GMT | 5 |
I have a 7970 Cisco ip phone, i want to add custom backgrounds but having a problem with the phone locating the TN images. I did some research and found the following bug CSCed55220 The Cisco IP Phone 7970 is missing the custom background
|
| Roaming on three Cisco Aironet (AIR-AP-1231G) | 28 Feb 2007 18:39 GMT | 8 |
At the moment I have four “ZyXEL ZyAIR B-1000” accesspoints. They are configured to use roaming (with no central server radius etc.) and they all have the same SSID. The clients move nicely between them, no problem… But they only support WEP and not WPA.
|
| Weird problem with pix 6.3(5) | 28 Feb 2007 18:27 GMT | 8 |
We switch to Cisco pix firewall 6.3(5) last week and have a very weird problem. (1) No one from the "outside" can access our web server after the server runs a while, but people from the "inside" can access the web server no
|
| 10G | 28 Feb 2007 18:15 GMT | 1 |
where can I find explained 10G in comparation to 1G? Are the cables the same ... what is the diference? thanks!
|
| ASA to send SNMP Trap including VPN Username | 28 Feb 2007 15:36 GMT | 1 |
Is there a way of getting the ASA to send a trap when a user logs onto the vpn which includes the Username of the user who's just logged on (and maybe even the information thats in the users table..such as client version)
|
| 1720 and WIC-1ENET - Odd Issues | 28 Feb 2007 15:17 GMT | 6 |
Hey, I'm having some sort of strange issues with a WIC-1ENET in a 1720. I'm running IOS 12.3(22) (c1700-y-mz.123-22.bin), and I have 8MB of Flash ROM. I don't have any other WIC's just this one WIC-1ENET. There are three scenarios that seem to occur:
|
| Pix 6.3 to Pix 7.0 VPN | 28 Feb 2007 14:26 GMT | 2 |
Hi guys we've got a 506e on 6.3 and a 515 running on v7.0, i've managed to get the VPN tunnel to create but the only traffic that seems to be passing through the tunnel is ICMP pings, i've posted both configs below, if anyone has any ideas i'd really appreciate some
|
| PIX | odd netmask on nat statement | 28 Feb 2007 12:04 GMT | 2 |
I have a config that I inherited that shows an odd method of natting. The nat (inside) statment has a netmask of 255.255.240.192 following the network prefix. the behavior appears to allow a certain range in the /24 to nat and other range still within the same /24 to not nat.
|
| QoS not working | 28 Feb 2007 12:03 GMT | 2 |
I have follow QoS configuration on Cisco Access Point: class-map match-all _class_testowa1 match access-group name testowywww class-map match-all _class_testowa0
|
| cisco pix VPN routing issues | 28 Feb 2007 11:31 GMT | 8 |
I've got 4 site-to-site VPN tunnels to PIX 515E in my central office (A). From this office I can ping branch offices B, C and D. From offices B, C and D I can also ping my central office A. However, my problem is that I can't ping office C from office B or office D from
|
| Cisco 801 configuration | 28 Feb 2007 11:00 GMT | 1 |
Please, please I need help. I have a Cisco 765 ISDN connected to remote Cisco (not mine). My 765 has broken and I have got now a Cisco 801 but dont know how to configure.
|
| Configure ssh access to router ... possible without domain name? | 28 Feb 2007 01:51 GMT | 3 |
The only way I can find to configure ssh on a router vty is as follows crypto rsa generate rsa line vty 0 15 transport input ssh
|
| Routing Question - How to send default internet traffic to PIX and VPN traffic from router out internet | 27 Feb 2007 22:00 GMT | 1 |
This is the scenario: I have a network with Subnet: 192.168.1.0/20 A Cisco 1841 Exists as the default Gateway: 192.168.1.1 Fa0/1, Fa0/2 is 66.43.54.111
|
| question on the internal IP address design | 27 Feb 2007 21:04 GMT | 4 |
Hi, forks, I have a question on how to design our private IP addresses after we upgrade the network to fiber optics and maintain only one LAN. We are a local government entity which has three geographical sites
|
| Cisco 3260 - Ran out of address? | 27 Feb 2007 14:19 GMT | 4 |
I have an Internet router (c3260) and for some reason users are not able to get any ip's off of it anymore. I suspect that I need to increase the dhcp pool, but thought that I run this by you guys and see what comes up....
|