Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsPC HardwareCPUMotherboardsVideo CardsStorageNetworkingPeripheralsBrand Name Systems
Related Topics
Video GamesWindowsMS Server ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

Hardware Forum / PC Hardware / Overclocking / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

WTB: AMD Palomino 2100

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Henry - 31 Aug 2004 16:39 GMT
I am looking to purchase the amd Palomino 2100 at a reasonable price.
Please email with prices.
Wes Newell - 31 Aug 2004 17:09 GMT
> I am looking to purchase the amd Palomino 2100 at a reasonable price.
> Please email with prices.

Why in the world would you want an old palomino core. And if it's because
the manufactures website sys that's the fastest it your board will take,
it's BS. I wish I had a hundred of them to sell to the idiots on ebay
bidding $70 and more for them.:-)

Signature

Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm

Neil - 31 Aug 2004 23:35 GMT
> > I am looking to purchase the amd Palomino 2100 at a reasonable price.
> > Please email with prices.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> it's BS. I wish I had a hundred of them to sell to the idiots on ebay
> bidding $70 and more for them.:-)

I think, at least some of the time, it is not BS.
I had an Asus MB that claimed the fastest
processor it was capable of supporting was a
Palomino 2100.  I bought a 2100 from a retailer
who assured me that a 2100 Thoroughbred would work
just fine.  It would not POST.  The Asus MB worked
fine with a 1900 Palomino that we found to test it
with and the 2100 T'bred worked fine in another
board that claimed to support it.  So there you
go.

I have no idea where you might get a Palomino
processor at a reasonable price.  I gave up and
chucked out the MB.  I'm using the T'bred 2100 I
bought initially now at 2100MHz in a KT333 MB I
got cheaply.  My advice to the OP would be to
chuck away the MB that requires the Palomino and
get something slightly more modern, but equally
cheap, which supports newer, more readily
available processors.

Neil
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.