Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsPC HardwareCPUMotherboardsVideo CardsStorageNetworkingPeripheralsBrand Name Systems
Related Topics
Video GamesWindowsMS Server ProductsMS OfficeMore Topics ...

Hardware Forum / Networking / Cisco / July 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Which Router T3/E3

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jeff Mac Pherson - 13 Jul 2004 19:00 GMT
Im looking to drop in a 20 Meg fractional DS3

I have choice of 7204VXR router or Cisco 3745 router.

I like to also run BGP and use a pair of T1.  

I worked with 3600 before but not the 72xx series.  Any suggestion ?
Hansang Bae - 14 Jul 2004 06:12 GMT
> Im looking to drop in a 20 Meg fractional DS3
> I have choice of 7204VXR router or Cisco 3745 router.
> I like to also run BGP and use a pair of T1.  
> I worked with 3600 before but not the 72xx series.  Any suggestion ?

3745 may be up to the task for this.  Any plans of expansion?  

Signature

hsb

"Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding"  Calvin
***************  USE ROT13 TO SEE MY EMAIL ADDRESS  ****************
********************************************************************
Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not not be able to
reply to emails sent to my account.  Please post a followup instead.
********************************************************************

Rob - 14 Jul 2004 14:49 GMT
Both will work fine.  The 3745 will handle two DS3 interfaces.  The
3725 will only handle one (Cisco marketing says this).

The 7200VXR will handle many more, depending on which NPE module.

I'd personally go with the 3745 as its a newer model, and more IOS
options may be available for it in the future(??)

-Robert

>Im looking to drop in a 20 Meg fractional DS3
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>I worked with 3600 before but not the 72xx series.  Any suggestion ?
Jeff Mac Pherson - 15 Jul 2004 19:38 GMT
Great.. I saw some of the EOL for 7200s... made me worried a little..

Price for 7204vxr came out to be 1-2k lower with the 225 engine..
waiting for the 400 engine.. I posed that question also.. to my boss..
do you want to get multiple ds3 or single ? no response yet.. glad to
know i can do with either.. I may get the 7204vxr with dual t3 and
dual t1.. thanks.  I rather have 3745 also but these guy didn't really
like my idea.. so its not my money

> The 7200VXR will handle many more, depending on which NPE module.
>
> I'd personally go with the 3745 as its a newer model, and more IOS
> options may be available for it in the future(??)
Prince By-Tor - 16 Jul 2004 03:59 GMT
>Great.. I saw some of the EOL for 7200s... made me worried a little..
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> I'd personally go with the 3745 as its a newer model, and more IOS
>> options may be available for it in the future(??)

I would not use a 3745 if you're planning on expansion.  Though Cisco
claims a 3745 can handle two DS3s, our internal lab testing says
otherwise.  In fact, we've found that (depending on packet size,
routing protocols used,  and other factors) a 3745 can't quite drive a
DS3 to full speed.  In practice I've implemented a single DS3 and it
works OK, but it makes me nervous.

I would absolutely recommend the 72xxVXR with an NPE-400.

--me
Rob - 16 Jul 2004 15:45 GMT
>I would not use a 3745 if you're planning on expansion.  Though Cisco
>claims a 3745 can handle two DS3s, our internal lab testing says
>otherwise.  In fact, we've found that (depending on packet size,
>routing protocols used,  and other factors) a 3745 can't quite drive a
>DS3 to full speed.  In practice I've implemented a single DS3 and it
>works OK, but it makes me nervous.

Really?  I am putting in a 3725 with a single DS3 here shortly.  I was
under the impression it could handle one just fine.  I guess I'll find
out.

-Robert
Steinar Haug - 16 Jul 2004 16:35 GMT
[Rob]

|   Really?  I am putting in a 3725 with a single DS3 here shortly.  I was
|   under the impression it could handle one just fine.  I guess I'll find
|   out.

As always - the difference between X Mbps of normal traffic and the
same amount of minimum-sized DoS traffic can be significant.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
Terry Baranski - 16 Jul 2004 23:45 GMT
>>I would not use a 3745 if you're planning on expansion.  Though Cisco
>>claims a 3745 can handle two DS3s, our internal lab testing says
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>under the impression it could handle one just fine.  I guess I'll find
>out.

The 3725 can do over 200Mbps with full-sized packets and no
performance-reducing features enabled.  But things change as packet
size decreases and processing-intensive features such as ACLs and NAT
are enabled.  The performance you'll get is completely dependant on
these factors.

-Terry
Prince By-Tor - 17 Jul 2004 23:22 GMT
>>I would not use a 3745 if you're planning on expansion.  Though Cisco
>>claims a 3745 can handle two DS3s, our internal lab testing says
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>under the impression it could handle one just fine.  I guess I'll find
>out.

Every situation is different, but when we stressed them in our labs
they did not hold up.  Again, we're running BGP, using them in large
networks with potentially large routing tables, often doing ISDN, GRE
tunnels, NAT, whatever.

Also, are you doing ATM DS3 or something else?  I suppose I should
have prefixed my comments...we use exclusively ATM at >T1.

Can't remember the numbers for the 3275, but we found the 3745 topped
out around 41 megabits.  Not shabby, but still.

--chris
Rob - 19 Jul 2004 14:09 GMT
>Also, are you doing ATM DS3 or something else?  I suppose I should
>have prefixed my comments...we use exclusively ATM at >T1.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>--chris

It's the standard clear channel E3/T3 interface for the 3700 series.
Not ATM.  I hope you're wrong, no offense.  It may be my job on the
line if it can't do 35Mb of a DS3.  Damn Cisco marketing.

:(

Robert
Hansang Bae - 20 Jul 2004 05:29 GMT
[snip]
> Every situation is different, but when we stressed them in our labs
> they did not hold up.  Again, we're running BGP, using them in large
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Can't remember the numbers for the 3275, but we found the 3745 topped
> out around 41 megabits.  Not shabby, but still.

Adding GRE to the mix can be a deal breaker.

Signature

hsb

"Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding"  Calvin
***************  USE ROT13 TO SEE MY EMAIL ADDRESS  ****************
********************************************************************
Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not not be able to
reply to emails sent to my account.  Please post a followup instead.
********************************************************************

Rob - 16 Jul 2004 15:43 GMT
I would not buy less than a NPE-400 today, IMO.

>Great.. I saw some of the EOL for 7200s... made me worried a little..
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> I'd personally go with the 3745 as its a newer model, and more IOS
>> options may be available for it in the future(??)
Hansang Bae - 17 Jul 2004 05:52 GMT
> I would not buy less than a NPE-400 today, IMO.

Or take it a step further and get the GE's.  Built in GE, no BW points,
life is better.

Signature

hsb

"Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding"  Calvin
***************  USE ROT13 TO SEE MY EMAIL ADDRESS  ****************
********************************************************************
Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not not be able to
reply to emails sent to my account.  Please post a followup instead.
********************************************************************

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.