> Hi Conor, thank you for the info. I tried Sandra and got a memory
> bandwidth of about 3.2 gigs. Then I reconfigured the memory from
> A1/A2 to A1/B1 and there was a new POST message about dual channel
> mode enabled. Sandra showed a definite improvement of about 5.8 gigs.
Git.
> I can't believe I went all this time without realizing that dual
> channel relied on memory placement. Ah well, we live and we learn. Ty
> again for your reply.
I only get around 3.2Gb/s in dual channel...

Signature
Conor
I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
Mbr - 30 Sep 2007 13:05 GMT
>> Hi Conor, thank you for the info. I tried Sandra and got a memory
>> bandwidth of about 3.2 gigs. Then I reconfigured the memory from
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>
>I only get around 3.2Gb/s in dual channel...
My motherboard autodetected my memory settings incorrectly, which is
either a quirk with my motherboard or my memory. But the msg boards
on the website where I bought my hardware stated that this is normal
and that the correct memory settings must be entered manually, which
wasn't a problem. The optimal settings for my own memory are 4-4-4-12
CAS 4 @ 2.1v. Try researching for the optimal settings for your
memory and checking your bios to see if its correct.
Conor - 30 Sep 2007 18:46 GMT
> >> Hi Conor, thank you for the info. I tried Sandra and got a memory
> >> bandwidth of about 3.2 gigs. Then I reconfigured the memory from
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> CAS 4 @ 2.1v. Try researching for the optimal settings for your
> memory and checking your bios to see if its correct.
Sadly, I have.

Signature
Conor
I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.